翻訳と辞書 |
Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations : ウィキペディア英語版 | Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations
''Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations'', , is a 1973 decision of the United States Supreme Court which upheld an ordinance enacted in Pittsburgh that forbids sex-designated classified advertising for job opportunities, against a claim by the parent company of the ''Pittsburgh Press'' that the ordinance violated its First Amendment rights. ==Background== The case involved an ordinance passed after Wilma Scott Heide of the Pittsburgh chapter of the National Organization for Women filed a complaint with the Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations, in which it argued that the practice of the ''Pittsburgh Press'' of advertising help wanted classified advertising under headings of "help wanted-male" and "help wanted-female" was discriminatory. Evidence from Gerald Gardner quantified the discriminatory nature of the advertising, showing that fewer jobs and ones with lower pay were being offered for women.〔Hopey, Don. ("Obituary: Gerald H.F. Gardner / Scientist, teacher, social activist and feminist" ), ''Pittsburgh Post-Gazette'', July 27, 2009. Accessed July 29, 2009.〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|